The Ford Bronco Has a Potential Problem = GX 550 !

WildsheepGS4
Jun 09, 2023

Rank II

Jun 09, 2023

I am not going to retract all the good things I have said about the Ford Bronco, but there is a new player in town, and there is no question this player is for real. Enter LEXUS GX 550.

I AM not going to get into the specifications, you can look all that up for yourself, because as of 8:00 pm last night it was all over the internet. But if this vehicle lives upto to its look and its on paper specs the bronco, the jeep, the Land Rover, Mercedes SUV's, and all other off road SUV's had better take notice especially if Lexus has the price point between $ 65,000. and say around $ 80,000.00 loaded.

I have to be honest if I was looking at a loaded Wildtrak at $ 70,000.00, A loaded bronco raptor at $ 97,000.00 MSRP, or a LOADED GX 550 at say $ 80,000.00 the bronco raptor would be out and it would be a very tough choice vs. the Wildtrak with even having to spend $ 5000.00 to $ 10,000.00 more.

Lexus just said, " hold my Japanese Beer ! ". And I mean that in a very good and intimidating way.
GAN
Last edited by a moderator: Jun 09, 2023

Rank II

Jun 10, 2023

#80
Your premise about a new luxury fixed-roof SUV from Lexus is going to pose as a sales threat to a non-luxury removable-roof ORV from a non-luxury manufacturer is completely asinine. Most posters in this thread tried to kindly explain it to you, and you have for no justifable reason, just climbed up their asses over their accurately stated opinions.

I don't give a flying crap if you own four Fords or not, your ill-concieved premise has nothing to do with brand loyalty. Wose is now you double down on your opinion that Ford's suck and don't last to high mileages because the company is based in Michigan and assembles vehicles in Michigan just makes you look even more stupid. If you think Fords suck, then continuing to personally own multiple examples of Fords indicates even more you are a dumbass and could concoct such a stupid premise that is the topic of this thread.

You unjustly insulted me and many others because of our posts. Everyone started out nicely pointing out the premise is flawed because the GX and Bronco are in different market classes. I'm just telling you in plain language the topic of this thread is stupid.

Apologies for being rude, but you deserve it.

I have to apologize, I didn't realize that you where so sensitive about what you drive. Again if I hated ford I wouldn't own $ 350,000.00 worth of ford vehicles, I think that would show that I like ford vehicles. But I try to be a realists and I understand what ford vehicles are = great vehicles ( broncos, bronco raptors, F 150 Raptors, Shelby Mustangs, and Ford GT'S ). But I try to be a realists and understand what they are. No question ford has made some iconic vehicles over the years, but facts are facts and numbers are numbers, and you can not compare Lexus build quality to fords. It's like comparing Tom Brady to dak Prescott. You can't in reality compare the two quarterbacks.

Yes Lexus concentrates on high quality luxury vehicles, but when they concentrate on high performance ( LC 500 or LFA) OR OFF ROAD with luxury ( land cruiser, forerunner, LX 600, or GX 550) they know what there doing and they do it right.

For somebody who doesn't care about taking the roof and doors off, and you start looking at spending $ 70,000 ( loaded Wildtrak) or $ 100,000 MSRP ( RAPTOR ) , the Lexus makes a compelling choice, especially when you look at build quality.
the poacher

🐎Miss my Bronco Buddy🐎

Jun 10, 2023

#81
Highly unlikely based on fords track record. Most recalls the past 3 years of any manufacturer.

So I doubt you’ll be wheeling after 20,000 miles. LOL.
Well, tell that to this guy with his '68. When something breaks or wears out, it gets repaired with bigger and stronger and you take it back out. That is part of the joy and fun of owning and using a Bronco.
Hi y'all, Lauri here and I am the proud owner of a MY21 Badlands, SAS, 2.7 auto, 4 door, soft top, Cactus Gray, no reservation, ordered 9/11/21, Took delivery 1/8/22!
PSUTE, the poacher

Rank V

Jun 10, 2023

#82
I would be down for a hybrid, but it would be nice if the battery range is more than 20. If they can figure out how to fit a 100 mile range battery with an engine that would be amazing, but considering the weight I doubt that will happen unless new battery technology comes out.
WildsheepGS4

Rank II

Jun 10, 2023

#83
I would be down for a hybrid, but it would be nice if the battery range is more than 20. If they can figure out how to fit a 100 mile range battery with an engine that would be amazing, but considering the weight I doubt that will happen unless new battery technology comes out.

I agree with you but doesn’t ford have a hybrid f 150 and Toyota has a hybrid engine in their trd pro tundra. And I think they get pretty good mileage.

Foxtrot Charlie KFG

Jun 10, 2023

#84
I agree with you but doesn’t ford have a hybrid f 150 and Toyota has a hybrid engine in their trd pro tundra. And I think they get pretty good mileage.
Correct me if I’m wrong but I believe @cmiller81 meant to refer to a PHEV or plug in hybrid, which will have a very limited “all-electric” range, and after reaching that performs as a typical hybrid. My PHEV Escape gets 34 miles of electric only range and then acts as a typical hybrid.
Riding OB1, 23 4- door Outer Banks, SAS, MOD, MIC, Lux, Ordered 10/20/22, delivered 1/13/23

Rank V

Jun 10, 2023

#85
I agree with you but doesn’t ford have a hybrid f 150 and Toyota has a hybrid engine in their trd pro tundra. And I think they get pretty good mileage.
yea but then you are getting in the price range of where the money saved on gas doesn't compare to price of the vehicle.
PSUTE, Bronco V-8

Rank V

Jun 10, 2023

#86
Correct me if I’m wrong but I believe @cmiller81 meant to refer to a PHEV or plug in hybrid, which will have a very limited “all-electric” range, and after reaching that performs as a typical hybrid. My PHEV Escape gets 34 miles of electric only range and then acts as a typical hybrid.
yea my bad. I meant phev.
Bluestreak57

Foxtrot Charlie KFG

Jun 10, 2023

#87
All the way back to the original title to the post…

I don’t believe the GX 550 is a problem for the Bronco. Two completely different vehicles targeting completely different markets.

I think the bigger problems for Ford and the Bronco are 1) build quality, 2) supply/transport issues, and 3) the small number of unscrupulous dealers ruining the buying experience for so many people…

Jeep selling hybrid and PHEV models and nothing of the sort currently in Ford’s lineup is, IMHO, a larger problem for Bronco.

A lot of Bronco buyers are not going off-road, but still would like the capability if the need arises.
Riding OB1, 23 4- door Outer Banks, SAS, MOD, MIC, Lux, Ordered 10/20/22, delivered 1/13/23
SuperMike, Darrel

Rank Benevolent Dictator

Jun 10, 2023

#88
Yep, and the GX will still be off reading after 100,000 miles. Lol.
You are correct, it will be off reading in a mall parking lot...
PSUTE, WildsheepGS4

Rank Benevolent Dictator

Jun 10, 2023

#89
Yep , and after 50,000 miles the soccer mom transport will still be running.
That is because it will be doing no off-roading, just soccer mom transporting.
PSUTE, Bronco V-8

Rank IV

Jun 10, 2023

#90
I have to apologize, I didn't realize that you where so sensitive about what you drive. Again if I hated ford I wouldn't own $ 350,000.00 worth of ford vehicles, I think that would show that I like ford vehicles. But I try to be a realists and I understand what ford vehicles are = great vehicles ( broncos, bronco raptors, F 150 Raptors, Shelby Mustangs, and Ford GT'S ). But I try to be a realists and understand what they are. No question ford has made some iconic vehicles over the years, but facts are facts and numbers are numbers, and you can not compare Lexus build quality to fords. It's like comparing Tom Brady to dak Prescott. You can't in reality compare the two quarterbacks.

Yes Lexus concentrates on high quality luxury vehicles, but when they concentrate on high performance ( LC 500 or LFA) OR OFF ROAD with luxury (land cruiser, forerunner, LX 600, or GX 550) they know what there doing and they do it right.

For somebody who doesn't care about taking the roof and doors off, and you start looking at spending $ 70,000 ( loaded Wildtrak) or $ 100,000 MSRP ( RAPTOR ) , the Lexus makes a compelling choice, especially when you look at build quality.
But you are the one making the (build) quality argument, none of us are. You brought the perceived quality issue up. You are making the luxury vs. non-luxury 'Ute comparison. You are arguing with yourself and upset no one agrees with you.

Like I said before, the master-mind of manufacturing "quality", Edwards Deming, whose quality methods were adopted by the Japanese in the aftermath WWII, is the definition of quality I use; that being "fitness for use". If one is interested in taking a vehicle deep off road, fording through creeks and rivers, running dusty trails or deserts, especially with the roof (and doors) removed, the Bronco is the higher quality vehicle than the GX. If you want to drive to a groomed off-road campground at a lake in leather-bound luxury with a 20-speaker stereo and memory-adjusted, heated/cooled 26-way electrically configurable seats, then the GX is the higher quality vehicle. One has a base price of $35K and the other (prospectively) $65K... duh.

The Bronco is designed to a broader based market. Its trim levels start at a bare bones Base model for off-road purists to build a rig from, up to a near-luxury Raptor model. It offers both a 2-door body and 4-door body configuration with a standard soft top or an optional hard top. It offers three engine choices and two transmission choices. It offers 4-levels of suspension and two levels of brakes. It offers tire choices from 30" to 37". It offers 3-levels of electronics integration and 3-levels of seat trim. So, in my view Ford has done an incredible job of offering a vehicle to a far broader spectrum of buyers while offering affordable pricing at each trim level. From the data presented so far for the GX, it offers just 4-doors, 33" tires, a single suspension design, a single engine and transmission choice, with trims that up-level the luxury continent. And maybe a hybrid drivetrain. Which vehicle build requirements do you think are more difficult to achieve, let alone considering the vehicle launch was during a worldwide viral pandemic?

This is what the posters here have been saying, they want the ORV Bronco because of the available steel bumpers, high approach and departure angles, locking front diff, electric-disconnect front swaybar, vinyl flooring and seats, and removable roof/doors. As far as recalls go, yeah, no argument, Ford at this present time has industry leading recalls, but there is no correlation between recalls and vehicle longevity; you are the one making that inference. I have a 17-year-old BMW 3-series with 420,000 miles on it (I bought new). It's had five (5) recalls; two related to airbags, and three related to fire hazards (twice for the same component). In comparison, my Black Diamond has had one recall, for the rear camera not turning off fast enough when in low-range. LOL.

Compare the pricing, content, and offroad capabilities between the Wrangler and Bronco, then that's the proper comparison. The price of the Raptor is reflected in market desirability, and it really is a low-volume one-off vehicle because it has a wider frame, different suspension, different brakes, different interior, different gauge cluster, and different engine than the non-Raptor Bronco. And the Raptor is way effing cooler than a Lexus GX.
No salt tram towers were harmed in the making of this post...
SuperMike, Mikexray

Rank IV

Jun 10, 2023

#91
You are correct, it will be off reading in a mall parking lot...
You caught that too... LOL.
No salt tram towers were harmed in the making of this post...
Mikexray, cmiller81

Who's your daddy?

Jun 10, 2023

#92
yea my bad. I meant phev.


gesundheit
Joined May 29, 2020 Member 546
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀​

Rank II

Jun 10, 2023

#93
But you are the one making the (build) quality argument, none of us are. You brought the perceived quality issue up. You are making the luxury vs. non-luxury 'Ute comparison. You are arguing with yourself and upset no one agrees with you.

Like I said before, the master-mind of manufacturing "quality", Edwards Deming, whose quality methods were adopted by the Japanese aftermath WWII, is the definition of quality I use, that being "fitness for use". If one is interested in taking a vehicle deep off road, fording through creeks and rivers, running dusty trails or deserts, especially with the roof (and doors) removed, the Bronco is the higher quality vehicle than the GX. If you want to drive to a groomed off-road campground at a lake in leather-bound luxury with a 20-speaker stereo and memory-adjusted, heated/cooled 26-way electrically configurable seats, then the GX is the higher quality vehicle. One has a base price of $35K and the other (prospectively) $65K... duh.

The Bronco is designed to a broader based market. Its trim levels start at a bare bones Base model for off-road purists to build a rig from, up to a near-luxury Raptor model. It offers both a 2-door body and 4-door body configuration with a standard soft top or an optional hard top. It offers three engine choices and two transmission choices. It offers 4-levels of suspension and two levels of brakes. It offers tire choices from 30" to 37". It offers 3-levels of electronics integration and 3-levels of seat trim. So, in my view Ford has done an incredible job of offering a vehicle to a far broader spectrum of buyers while offering affordable pricing at each trim level. From the data presented so far for the GX, it offers just 4-doors, 33" tires, a single suspension design, a single engine and transmission choice, with trims that up-level the luxury continent. And maybe a hybrid drivetrain. Which vehicle build requirements do you think are more difficult to achieve, let alone considering the vehicle launch was during a worldwide viral pandemic?

This is what the posters here have been saying, they want the ORV Bronco because of the available steel bumpers, high approach and departure angles, locking front diff, electric-disconnect front swaybar, vinyl flooring and seats, and removable roof/doors. As far as recalls go, yeah, no argument, Ford at this present time has industry leading recalls, but there is no correlation between recalls and vehicle longevity; you are the one making that inference. I have a 17-year-old BMW 3-series with 420,000 miles on it (I bought new). It's had five (5) recalls; two related to airbags, and three related to fire hazards (twice for the same component). In comparison, my Black Diamond has had one recall, for the rear camera not turning off fast enough when in low-range. LOL.

Compare the pricing, content, and offroad capabilities between the Wrangler and Bronco, then that's the proper comparison. The price of the Raptor is reflected in market desirability, and it really is a low-volume one-off vehicle because it has a wider frame, different suspension, different brakes, different interior, different gauge cluster, and different engine than the non-Raptor Bronco. And the Raptor is way effing cooler than a Lexus GX.

You might want to take the time and go actually visit the tahara factory in Japan and then go visit the factory in Dearborn, you might actually learn something. Although I don’t know if you would.

Rank II

Jun 10, 2023

#94
You are correct, it will be off reading in a mall parking lot...

Yep, ok 👌🏿

Rank II

Jun 10, 2023

#95
That is because it will be doing no off-roading, just soccer mom transporting.

You mean like the broncos going thru the McDonald’s and Dunkin’ Donuts drive thrus.

Rank II

Jun 10, 2023

#96
But you are the one making the (build) quality argument, none of us are. You brought the perceived quality issue up. You are making the luxury vs. non-luxury 'Ute comparison. You are arguing with yourself and upset no one agrees with you.

Like I said before, the master-mind of manufacturing "quality", Edwards Deming, whose quality methods were adopted by the Japanese in the aftermath WWII, is the definition of quality I use; that being "fitness for use". If one is interested in taking a vehicle deep off road, fording through creeks and rivers, running dusty trails or deserts, especially with the roof (and doors) removed, the Bronco is the higher quality vehicle than the GX. If you want to drive to a groomed off-road campground at a lake in leather-bound luxury with a 20-speaker stereo and memory-adjusted, heated/cooled 26-way electrically configurable seats, then the GX is the higher quality vehicle. One has a base price of $35K and the other (prospectively) $65K... duh.

The Bronco is designed to a broader based market. Its trim levels start at a bare bones Base model for off-road purists to build a rig from, up to a near-luxury Raptor model. It offers both a 2-door body and 4-door body configuration with a standard soft top or an optional hard top. It offers three engine choices and two transmission choices. It offers 4-levels of suspension and two levels of brakes. It offers tire choices from 30" to 37". It offers 3-levels of electronics integration and 3-levels of seat trim. So, in my view Ford has done an incredible job of offering a vehicle to a far broader spectrum of buyers while offering affordable pricing at each trim level. From the data presented so far for the GX, it offers just 4-doors, 33" tires, a single suspension design, a single engine and transmission choice, with trims that up-level the luxury continent. And maybe a hybrid drivetrain. Which vehicle build requirements do you think are more difficult to achieve, let alone considering the vehicle launch was during a worldwide viral pandemic?

This is what the posters here have been saying, they want the ORV Bronco because of the available steel bumpers, high approach and departure angles, locking front diff, electric-disconnect front swaybar, vinyl flooring and seats, and removable roof/doors. As far as recalls go, yeah, no argument, Ford at this present time has industry leading recalls, but there is no correlation between recalls and vehicle longevity; you are the one making that inference. I have a 17-year-old BMW 3-series with 420,000 miles on it (I bought new). It's had five (5) recalls; two related to airbags, and three related to fire hazards (twice for the same component). In comparison, my Black Diamond has had one recall, for the rear camera not turning off fast enough when in low-range. LOL.

Compare the pricing, content, and offroad capabilities between the Wrangler and Bronco, then that's the proper comparison. The price of the Raptor is reflected in market desirability, and it really is a low-volume one-off vehicle because it has a wider frame, different suspension, different brakes, different interior, different gauge cluster, and different engine than the non-Raptor Bronco. And the Raptor is way effing cooler than a Lexus GX.

When you build something right that works, meaning quality, you don’t need 5 different choices of trims and three different engines and two different transmissions. Actually the bronco can be configured more than 5 different ways, more like 8-9 different models. This is fords problem and Farley knows it. Ford does this with almost every truck and suv they build. They offer way to many configurations and they can never seem to concentrate or hit it right on just one that doesn’t have launch issues or quality recall issues.

Toyota most of the time will offer very few options when they come out with a new model , or should I say different configurations, because they usually nail it with what they offer and most of the time it will be built right.

For example at a Toyota/Lexus factory when there is a problem with something going down the assembly line, the assembly line stops and does not restart until the problem is fixed so when the vehicle is finished, it is finished right.

In the United States vehicles with issues go down the assembly line and get built even though there is known problems and then after the vehicle is completed ford tries to “ patch” up the problem. That’s one of the reasons there are so many vehicles parked in parking lots in Detroit waiting to be shipped, along with transportation issues.

If you are familiar with asphalt paving at all, if there is a problem with the quality of the road surface you need to fix it while the material is hot, because once it’s rolled in place there is no turning back.

Rank V

Jun 10, 2023

#97
I am enjoying where this thread is going

Lets see what the score is
Lexus (AKA soccer mom mobile) 1
Bronco 99

22.gif
SuperMike, Chief Ron

Rank IV

Jun 10, 2023

#98
Where have I seen this Lexus before?
Lexus-Cylon-Centurion.jpg
Hey I said that first!!!!!!😎
BuckYeah, Bronco V-8

Rank V

Jun 10, 2023

#99
Before you know it they be taking over all the mall parking lots forcing civilization into the wilderness. Oh wait, a bronco can actually handle going off road, guess we are good then.
1686416263239.png
PSUTE, BuckYeah

You must log in or register to post here.