Nov 18, 2022
Mikes2021Bronco, Laura
Last edited by a moderator:
Nov 18, 2022
Hopeful Bronco Owner
LaurenMarinelliNov 18, 2022
Love my Bronco!
TechnicalDisasterNov 18, 2022
Rank VI
ShoresyNov 18, 2022
Rank IV
extra toastyNov 18, 2022
Rank V
lapazleoNov 19, 2022
The 2.3 is probably sufficient but:
I test drove a 2.3 and floored it at highway speed. It pretty much just sat there. My 2.7 feels very powerful and smooth and is probably faster than it needs to be.
Non port fuel injection is a 2.3 problem in the making for carbon buildup down the road. There is pretty much no real gas mileage benefits between the two engines looking at the EPA data.
Just as concerning is the braking system on the 2.3’s. They already have a TSB documenting potential problems and fixes. Many folks have experienced them, so have many Ranger owners. Long stopping distances and soft pedal feeling have been documented.
If you get the 2.3 you also don’t get the one pedal drive if that is important to you.
On the plus side if you desire to manually shift, the 2.3 is the only way to go.
Rank VI
dover157Nov 19, 2022
Rank IV
extra toastyNov 19, 2022
EnintyI don’t think many people read the fine print on the Ford Performance warranty.
OP, it's a forced induction (turbocharged) engine, which does not experience the power loss at altitude than a normally aspirated engine does. The 2.3L has 300 HP running on 91/93 high octane fuel, which in most verisions of the Bronco is more than adequate. There is nearly a 500-pound weight differential between Bronco models, so the higher trim 4-door models are heavier than the Base and Big Bend models 2-door models. Adding off-road hardware like the modular bumper and skid plates (Black Diamond and Badlands) adds significant weight but based on my experience with my 2-dr Black Diamond and having driven in Colorado many times over the years (not yet in my Bronco) I think you'd have no issue with the 2.3L. Also, the automatic transmission has 10 forward gears, so there is no lack of gear ratio choices to keep the 2.3L in its powerband.
Also, Ford just released the factory warranty-backed 2.3L engine tune, which boosts horsepower to 330 and torque to 385 pound-foot. The torque increase of 65 pound-foot is significant. It's $825 + installation.
John
sportcoupeNov 19, 2022
Rank VI
ShoresyNov 19, 2022
Hoping this will help with the exhaust note! Just arrived this morning!I live in NM, just over 6,000 ft elevation at my house. Have taken my 2door 2.3 manual up Sandia crest 10,000 feet twice now and it loves climbing hills. I regularly catch myself hitting 90 getting on the interstate because it just pulls through the gears so well. If rolling in second and get into it can feel the left front try to pick up and the right rear try to pass me with the torque steer. The turbo lag is definitely noticeable but easy enough to adapt to. I was skeptical about the 2.3 having enough torque on the low end for off road use but after spending a few hours tooling around the forest roads today it had no problem climbing up anything I encountered. The only real negative I can give it is the sound. It’s a GDI 4 banger it’s never gonna have a sound that matches the looks of the bronco. You can change out the exhaust and make it sound like an import street racer but neither engine option will have the nice rumble of a small block V8 or inline 6.
Just my $.02
Former full size owner
MandogusNov 19, 2022
Rank VI
ShoresyNov 20, 2022
I would say less affected. Air density is still lower, and compressor speeds are limited and intercoolers are less effective.A forced induction engine (turbo or supercharger) is not affected by elevation. It has the same power at 20k feet as it does at sea level.
Pay attention to fuel though. Regular fuel is not the same everywhere. At higher elevations, 85 octane is regular. You should avoid the mistake of just selecting regular at the pump without looking.
Rank V
87BroncoVBNov 20, 2022
Rank IV
extra toastyNov 21, 2022
Manufacturers can claim anything. I have bought plenty of big benefit claim items over the years that did absolutely nothing.Can always add one of these for more airflow and power too.
STRESS FREE !!!
Mikes2021BroncoNov 21, 2022
I can't say for Colorado, but the 2.3 is not lacking power... +275 hp and plenty of tq... remember just 15-20 years ago... those were V8 numbers... but again.. not sure how turbos are affected by elevation. I don't think you would be disappointed.Hi! I am finding less expensive Broncos in some states outside of Colorado, but they have a 2.3 L- 4-Cylinder Turbo Engine. Is this engine sufficient for the Colorado Mountains? Thank you in advance!
Rank V
NT AUTOMOTIVENov 22, 2022
Attachments
You must log in or register to post here.