Ahhh catch cans….. as someone who has been driving a Kia with a GDI engine for 116k miles I really wish I had one but the Kia warranty has enough loopholes as it is so I never tempted fate with one. As far as functionality of one here is my amateur, not an engineer, not a certified auto technician, just someone with a pretty good understanding of physics, thermodynamics and internal combustion engines, opinion.
On the 2.7 with both direct injection and multi port injection the benefits of a catch can will be minimal at best, same for any engine with fuel added before the combustion chamber via multipoint injection, throttle body injection or carburetor.
The 2.3 being solely direct injection (which I am a fan of for the balance of economy and power) an oil catch can could have a lot of benefits for reducing maintenance costs and minimizing power loss as the engine ages.
How does a catch can help? Well for that we need to dig a little deeper. All internal combustion engines generate pressure inside the crankcase. Be it from thermal expansion as it warms up, off gassing of oil as it breaks down and piston blow by. This pressure has to go somewhere or the engine block will quite literally explode. In the early days this was simply vented to the outside and all was good, until emission controls came along. With the advent of emissions controls you could no longer vent those gasses that contain aerosols of oil and leaked combustion gasses into the atmosphere. The solution was to add a Pressurized Crankcase Vent (PCV) valve to one of the valve covers and feed the gasses back into the intake air stream, some people would still bypass this with a small air filter directly attached to the PCV but I personally see no performance reason for it. This system worked relatively well by allowing those gasses to be burned and passed through the catalyst in the exhaust system to be neutralized. Then comes the advent of Gas Direct Injection (GDI) which has evolved into a good system that allows the computer to accurately adjust the amount of fuel injected into each cylinder, as well as the timing of fuel injection depending on how much power is being called for at that exact moment. The single biggest downside of GDI, well that is the aforementioned PCV system. On other fuel delivery systems there is a constant flow of fuel atomized in the intake air which passes over the intake valves on each cycle and helps to cool, clean and lubricate the back side of the valve which reduces the amount of oil vapors and other carbons introduced by the PCV that may stick to the backside of the valves. So what? you think. Well having that oil and tar and gunk on the back of the valves impedes the airflow into the cylinders, thus reducing the power the engine is capable of making and if left untreated can build up to the point a valve may not close properly leading to a dead cylinder.
To get around this problem someone came up with a catch can in between the PCV and the intake manifold. This device is a place where the air containing those gasses from the crankcase has a chance to cool down and let some of the impurities condense and remain in the can. This in turn reduces the amount oil vapor available to stick to the intake valves and become carbon build up. Now no catch can system is perfect so some oil does make it through so routine cleaning of the intake valves is recommended but with less oil in the airstream there will be less deposits to clean.
Hope that clears up some of the “why” in catch can discussions, the “should I?” Will depend on you, and your preferences. For me having ordered the 2.3 I plan on having a conversation with the service manager at my dealership when it comes in. If it’s not a major risk to the warranty I will be installing one, if Ford says no then I will be cleaning my intake valves every oil change again. Hope this helped at least some people.
22 Black Diamond 2dr non sas w tow and roof rails.
Reformed Wrangler, aquaman2therescue