I'm glad someone posted a high quality, high-end, light for comparison. This illustrates the "bigger is better mentality" in a lot of what we do, and what we see so much of, and ever-increasing in this "sport" or field.
The beam distance of the KC Lite is 972m (3188 feet). That means if you wanted to have a reaction time for animals (deer) of three seconds (which is typical in a driving scenario) you could drive at 680 mph. That's fast! Now, is having that much light beneficial? I'd say there are diminishing returns because you're paying almost ten-times more for those KC Lites than something like the Hella lights and you're never going to drive 680 mph. But, maybe you want more time to react, say 15 seconds. That means you could drive 144 mph and have 15 seconds of reaction time. There is no place on earth you could drive off road in your Bronco at 144 mph.
So, the question becomes, why pay $529 for lights that you can never use (to their capacity). There is no practical benefit in a driving situation. The reason I see for buying lights that you can use while driving somewhere between 150 mph and 650 mph...bragging rights and ego, or maybe they just look cool.
Now, none of this is important if my math is wrong, or if you're interested in how much cooler those lights look than a more budget-friendly option.
2022 Jeep JLR, manual with even more extra guacamole
Sold - 2021 Jeep JLR, manual w/extra guacamole