I've been studying the new K03 tires. I ran a couple of AI questions against the K02 & K03. The bottom line from that is the K03 has less road noise, especially after they had a few miles on them. They compare equal for snow, mud, and off road issues/toughness. The one thing it mentioned was there have been balance issues with the K03, especially at high speeds. Was wondering if anyone has experienced this and what they are and what had to be done to correct? Did BF cover them under warranty, etc.?
Thanks,
Dave
This is what Tire Rack says. They do in-depth on road testing.
BFGOODRICH ALL-TERRAIN T/A KO3Off-Road All-Terrain[View category averages for off-road all-terrain tires]LT265/70R17 123/120S LRE
Overall: 5.93/10
Road Ride: The tire exhibited a firm, controlled ride that managed to dull the more pointed impacts, but was largely unremarkable. There were distinct, layered tones that blended well at highway speeds but were more noticeable on smoother surfaces. On coarser asphalt, the noise evened out, blending into the other tones, but switching back to smooth pavement, there was a subtle hum that remained audible. It responded quickly to steering input with minimal delay, offering an experience that felt almost 1:1, with the motion of the wheel translating fully, immediately to the motion of the vehicle. It was both light and accurate, though feedback was only moderate in corners.Wet Track: The All-Terrain T/A KO3 felt largely adequate - in a subjective sense - with decent front-end sharpness and communication. However, when it came to actual performance, it just fell short, with slow response times, extended braking, and limited lateral grip. It felt confidently in control, especially at lower speeds, but was quickly overwhelmed at higher speeds. Power delivery lacked confidence, leading to a generally underwhelming driving experience that felt better than it was.Dry Characteristics/Emergency Lane Change: It really struggled with stability and precision in the lane-change maneuver. It would start off feeling fine, and then the front-end traction was gone. Attempts to change direction led to understeer and even rear-end instability at times. The whole experience was marked by persistent understeer and a lack of stability, with only minor responsiveness in the front end that failed to inspire confidence. It felt unpredictable and ultimately never made a successful lane change attempt.Winter: In the snow, it was a little sensitive to throttle, but not terribly so. Braking was reasonable, at just over 72 feet from 25mph. Steering was quick to respond, moving the front end with eagerness, if not athleticism. It was nice to drive around the circle, with only the occasional drift, and rarely pushed, for a more oversteer-biased approach. When it reached its limit on the off-ramp, more steering only made the tires push wider, and applying even light braking made for a full, slow rotation. The limits were edgy, easy to step over, which could be a bit unfriendly. Ice braking was the worst in the test, at over 53 feet to come to a stop from 12 mph. Still, a reasonable showing overall.